Class Waivers in Employment Arbitration Agreements

October 01, 2012

In April 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark opinion addressing whether arbitration agreements drafted to prohibit class relief are enforceable. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S.Ct. 1740 (2011) reiterated the Court's strong and consistent message that arbitration agreements must be enforced according to their terms.

It emphasized in its holding that the parties' expectations must be honored even if those terms include class or collective action waivers, because "arbitration is a matter of contract." In fact, the Concepcion Court went further and noted the incompatibility between arbitration's demonstrated efficiencies in resolving individual disputes compared with the statistical inefficiency of class relief. It concluded that class relief is inappropriate in arbitration unless the parties' agreement specifically authorizes it.

To read more about this topic, please see full article by clicking here, which was published in the October 2012 issue of the LJN Franchising Business & Law Alert.



Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • "Like any commercial litigation practice, it takes a while to get completely up to speed on how a client's corporation works. Once the understanding was there, Burr & Forman put their head down and worked very hard for excellent results."

    -Best Lawyers 2012

  • “We work predominantly with Ed Brown. He has a couple of people alongside him providing support – Kathryn Bouchillon and Harvey Daniels. Both are very good.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “She is efficient, practical, no-nonsense and smart."

    -Chambers 2013

  • “She’s on my shortlist of lawyers I like working with. She’s very practical and does a lot of retail work and banking work.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “He is great. The most important thing I think is judgment, whether more aggressive or more conservative than a firm’s first inclination. Tom’s got a great sense of discretion and judgment and he clearly knows the topic area very well. We never have an issue with us having to prompt ‘try this theory’. He’s smart and very pleasant, responsive as anything.”

    -Chambers 2012