Class Waivers in Employment Arbitration Agreements

October 01, 2012

In April 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark opinion addressing whether arbitration agreements drafted to prohibit class relief are enforceable. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S.Ct. 1740 (2011) reiterated the Court's strong and consistent message that arbitration agreements must be enforced according to their terms.

It emphasized in its holding that the parties' expectations must be honored even if those terms include class or collective action waivers, because "arbitration is a matter of contract." In fact, the Concepcion Court went further and noted the incompatibility between arbitration's demonstrated efficiencies in resolving individual disputes compared with the statistical inefficiency of class relief. It concluded that class relief is inappropriate in arbitration unless the parties' agreement specifically authorizes it.

To read more about this topic, please see full article by clicking here, which was published in the October 2012 issue of the LJN Franchising Business & Law Alert.



Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • “I think a lot of him. He is reasonable and logical. He is very good at getting the deal done and doing so in a collaborative way as opposed to adversarial. I always refer to him and believe he will take care of the client.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “Definitely have depth and expertise...They have a successful model and one that I’ve tried to imitate."

    -Chambers 2012

  • “My primary contacts at the firm are Doug Anderson and John Kavanagh. Doug assists in real estate matters and John assists in maritime and litigation matters. Both are outstanding attorneys with a wealth of knowledge in their areas. They both have many strengths, but the most valuable quality is their practical, no nonsense and efficient approach to all issues.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “Very responsive. An excellent lawyer with a lot of experience."

    -Chambers 2012

  • “As a client of Burr & Forman, I feel that my organization has excellent representation.  I have consulted with Amy Jordan and Bryance Metheny on numerous issues and have always found them both to be very responsive and to clarify legal matters or concerns with a sense of urgency. Specifically, Amy has handled our EEOC claims with the utmost attention to detail and has been the reason that we were successful in defending our EEOC claims with the level of success that we have had thus far.

    When we were being inundated with unemployment decisions favoring former employees, Bryance and Amy met with our Human Resources team to instruct us on the specifics of the section of law and we have had great success in turning our experience rating and saving our company a great deal in unemployment costs.  My organization relies heavily on the attorneys at Burr & Forman to provide legal advice as it relates to our strategic initiatives and to decrease our liability as an employer.”

    -Catherine Houston, Director of Human Resources, CLP Corporation