Burr & Forman Partner Jeff Baker Featured in January issue of Franchising Business & Law Alert

January 04, 2013

Jeff Baker, a Birmingham-based partner in Burr & Forman's Business Section, was profiled in the January issue of Franchising Business & Law Alert.

Baker provided his perspective regarding the control of many franchise systems by private equity or venture capital funds, or other investment groups:

"Most franchise systems were originally built around the concept of personal investment by individual entrepreneurs who would run the franchised business as an owner/ operator. Access to capital and other factors tended to keep growth rates moderate. Once franchisees started becoming large enough to attract investment by private equity funds and similar investors, we began to see a shift in the power dynamic between franchisee and franchisor. Private equity funds have the ability to put together complex capital structures that enable rapid growth, and growth is their game. In response to the potential economic threat posed by a system of very large franchisees run by investors rather than owner/operators, some franchisors have started to implement size limits on their franchisees.

Private equity funds generally prefer not to hold real estate in their portfolio companies because fee-owned real estate presents risk and valuation issues that can be difficult to quantify when calculating the fund’s projected return on investment. As a result, many franchisees have found themselves in the position of pushing their operating properties into the sale-leaseback market in order to posture the business for sale. Careful attention must be paid to the assignment and change--of--control provisions embedded in such leases in order to make certain that the sale-leaseback landlord does not obtain unreasonable control rights that could limit the franchisee’s ability to sell to a private equity fund or, more importantly, limit the private equity fund’s exit strategy on the next turn of the company."



Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • “He is an excellent attorney, a very good litigator. He has a very good and calm demeanor and doesn’t get wild. He keeps his cool and continues to pile on. He is a good planner in terms of strategy."

    -Chambers 2012

  • “Tully Hazell has a keen business sense and understands how to talk with the commercial side of our business in a way that is understandable and not too laden with legalese. Tully has a strong knowledge of both our business and our industry which enables him to provide relevant responses to our questions. We also appreciate that we can always rely on Tully to provide timely responses to our requests.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “Gail strikes the perfect balance between protecting her client and getting the deal done in a most pleasant and efficient manner.”

    -Jim Adams, Daniel Corporation

  • “I have worked with Chris Linde and Eric Golden on two separate legal matters.  In both, their level headedness and systematic approach to the various outcomes were planned and continually communicated with me. I felt very much a part of the process. While the legal process was drawn out due to the court system, Chris and Eric made the process as smooth as possible and never promised anything they knew they couldn't deliver on.  I highly recommend both of them for legal issues and will definitely retain them again on new issues that may arise.”

    -John Lehr, MD

  • “He approaches problems from a business solution perspective. He is very skilled at negotiations with other lawyers. Very easy to work with and not confrontational. He is passionate about what he does and he is somebody who loves to do what he does mostly to solve problems, not to bring people down. He really tries to find a win-win solution for all parties involved and he gets a lot of pleasure out of that.”

    -Chambers 2012