Alabama Lawyer Magazine: Money for Nothing: Who Is Entitled to the Excess Paid at a Tax Sale?

November 27, 2012

Section 40-10-28 of the Alabama Code, which is part of the statutory framework governing real property tax sales, addresses who is entitled to excess funds paid by a purchaser at an ad valorem tax sale.

According to the Association of County Commissioners of Alabama, section 40-10-28 is “[o]ne of the most confusing statutes in Alabama law.”1 Indeed, the application of section 40-10-28 has been the focus of numerous lawsuits in recent years.

What Is an Excess?

When taxes are not paid on real property, the probate court in the county where the property is located can order the sale of the property to satisfy the tax obligation.2Pursuant to procedures identified in sections 40-10-1 through -31 of the Alabama Code, Alabama county officials offer for sale by public auction thousands of tax-delinquent real properties every year, with the properties being sold to the highest bidder. The “excess” discussed in this article is the amount paid for a tax-delinquent property that exceeds the minimum bid requirement. The minimum bid is the total of the unpaid taxes, accrued interest and sale-related costs. Following the tax sale, the minimum bid portion of the amount paid by the purchaser is distributed to the various taxing authorities entitled to the taxes. The “excess” portion of the bid is held by the county treasurer to be distributed pursuant to section 40-10-28.

To read more about this topic, please see full article below

Download PDF


Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • “I would single him out as a wonderful leader.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “Definitely have depth and expertise...They have a successful model and one that I’ve tried to imitate."

    -Chambers 2012

  • “He quickly grasps the issues and tailors the trial and testimony for maximum benefit.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “As a banker working out troubled loans, I really appreciated Keith's ability to help me with my legal issues, but I really valued his ability to help me understand the full spectrum of responses available to me as well as describe the pros and cons of each option. Keith's value as an attorney is amazing, but is far surpassed by his ability as a trusted advisor.”

    -Rebecca York, Mercantile Bank

  • “I worked with him before...He’s a good lawyer with a good reputation.”

    -Chambers 2012