Birmingham Medical News: Health Care Industry Targeted by OSHA in Push to Reduce Workplace Violence

August 22, 2012

Organizations in the healthcare industry are likely already aware that all employers have a duty to take measures to ensure the safety of their employees. These organizations may also know that workplace violence is a safety risk that must be addressed. Nonetheless, it is important for health care employers to be aware of the specific workplace violence concerns that are unique to the healthcare industry and how to avoid legal consequences that can result if an employer fails to adequately address these concerns. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) provides that all employers have a general duty to provide employees with a workplace “free from recognized hazards … that are likely to cause death or serious physical harm” to employees. A recent directive published by OSHA in September 2011 for the first time details the application of this “general duty clause” to workplace violence incidents. Notably, the directive narrows its scope to industries considered “vulnerable” to workplace violence and identifies healthcare and social services employers as a focus industry.

To read more about this topic, please see full article below

Download PDF



Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • "The Burr & Forman Creditor's Rights group is top notch and definitely should be ranked with the nation's best lawyers. They are responsive, timely, very knowledgeable, resourceful, and helpful. They fight for their clients while offering alternative strategies that may be less expensive. That being said, they will "go to the mat" if necessary and do so in a prudent well prepared manner."

    -Best Lawyers 2012

  • “Dwight is a very knowledgeable corporate lending attorney. He seems to have specific competencies around multi-bank and syndicated loans, and is fair and practical. He has a good awareness of not only legal aspects of representing a bank in a commercial loan transaction, but also an awareness of the distinction between legal and business issues and the practical implications of each."

    -Chambers 2012

  • “He’s probably the best attorney I know – an excellent attorney. He is one of the few that understands business – a deal maker not a deal breaker. He grasps very readily the picture of what’s going on and he is a quick observer. He’s a lawyer with an understanding of business – a bit of a psychologist who understands what makes people tick. He is quick and efficient. The billing is always reasonable. We are very happy with him.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “George is good at everything as a specialist in those areas. He isn’t frightened by going where no-one has gone before and is very solution-oriented. He can lay out diagrams/menus/ procedures to follow and it works.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “A strong lawyer…"

    -Chambers 2012