BuildSouth: Considering Construction Delivery Methods on Public Works

January 16, 2013

Historically, in Alabama, the project delivery methods available for owners to de-sign and construct private projects have differed from those delivery methods available to owners of public projects. Private owners are permitted to use any delivery method they choose based on their interests in time, budget, and quality. In contrast, under the current law, public owners in Alabama are required to use competitive bidding and, thus, the Design-Bid-Build (“DBB”) delivery method has traditionally been the method used to de-sign and construct public projects.

But construction trade groups such as the Alabama AGC are exploring introducing legislation that would allow use of CM at Risk on Public Works with certain restrictions. The DBB project delivery method will continue to be popular in the public and private construction industry. The characteristics of this delivery method make it most suitable for projects with clear boundaries and for those with adequate time to prepare thorough documents and to execute the construction. DBB remains a safe method for public agencies to contract for most construction.

To read more about this topic, please see full article below

Download PDF


Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • "...He has written a lot about Alabama employment law. Probably the leader of the group at Burr & Forman.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • "Rik Tozzi attracts praise for his trial skills.  He has been involved in a number of consumer cases, such as acting . . . in a matter brought by the City of Birmingham against various mortgage companies seeking damages for alleged violations of the federal Fair Housing Act."

    -Chambers 2010

  • "He's a very good attorney: diligent, thorough and always on top of things. A real trial lawyer."

    -Chambers 2013

  • “He is quick to respond and practical, and the advice he gives is always to the point."

    -Chambers 2012

  • “He is a great real estate lawyer. He is practical as opposed to a theorist. He has common sense and is a problem-solving real estate attorney. His demeanor is very calm – he doesn’t overreact and thinks through the issue before he starts talking about it. He is calm, steady and persistent. I have recommended him to others and they have used him too. He is a prize, the kind of attorney you want – not throw his weight around, not center of attention, calmly deal with, keep it low key and move it forward. He evaluates things and possible compromises. He just gets what you need done. I don’t know all real estate lawyers but I know a lot of them, he is as good as any of them.”

    -Chambers 2012