Burr Alert: FINRA Updates Guidance on its Suitability Rule

December 19, 2012

In its Regulatory Notice 12-55, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") has updated its guidance on FINRA Rule 2111 concerning suitability.

This is FINRA's fourth regulatory notice concerning the rule -- it previously published Regulatory Notice 12-25, Regulatory Notice 11-25, and Regulatory Notice 11-02 -- but this notice takes the rule in a slightly different direction, at least appearing to soften enforcement of the rule. This guidance is important to brokers and advisors, particularly because Rule 2111 is reported to have been the "most common ground for disciplinary action this year."1

Rule 2111 requires, in pertinent part, that "[a] member or an associated person must have a reasonable basis to believe that a recommended transaction or investment strategy involving a security or securities is suitable for the customer, based on the information obtained through the reasonable diligence of the member or associated person to ascertain the customer's investment profile." The rule goes on to clarify that "[a] customer's investment profile includes, but is not limited to, the customer's age, other investments, financial situation and needs, tax status, investment objectives, investment experience, investment time horizon, liquidity needs, risk tolerance, and any other information the customer may disclose to the member or associated person in connection with such recommendation." It is based on NASD Rule 2310.

To read more about this topic, please see full article below Download PDF


Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • “We would use them even in geographic areas where the firm is not in their natural footprint.”

    - Chambers 2014

  • “One of the most active in town. A good guy.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “I think a lot of him. He is reasonable and logical. He is very good at getting the deal done and doing so in a collaborative way as opposed to adversarial. I always refer to him and believe he will take care of the client.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “I think they’re great. They cost dramatically less but still offer a full suite of services. They have all the wherewithal to get work done without the New York rates.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “He is extremely helpful and knowledgeable on workout process. I look to him a lot for legal advice. He has a real handle on what we’re doing and how to get it done. He is great – very practical, very engaging and just a real pleasure to work with – one of my favorite attorneys. He does what I tell him to do. He knows the law and the practical side. He has some younger lawyers that work with him who are also very engaging.”

    -Chambers 2012