Burr Alert: Georgia Foreclosure Law in the Wake of Recent Decisions on Residential Mortgage Loans

December 27, 2012

Thousands of wrongful foreclosure lawsuits are filed each year in Georgia against banks, lenders, servicers, foreclosure firms, and other entities involved in the non-judicial foreclosure process for residential mortgage loans.

There has been recent upheaval in Georgia foreclosure law resulting from several key cases decided in 2012. We do not summarize the cases here, but rather seek to analyze their decisions’ impact on Georgia’s non-judicial foreclosure process while we await the Georgia Supreme Court’s response.

Reese v. Provident Funding Associates, LLP, 730 S.E.2d 551, 317 Ga. App. 353 (Ga. Ct. App. July 12, 2012)

In a sharply-divided decision, the majority held, as a matter of first impression, that Georgia’s foreclosure notice statute, O.C.G.A. § 44-14-162.2(a), requires the person or entity conducting a non-judicial foreclosure of a residential mortgage loan to provide the borrower/debtor with a written notice of the foreclosure sale that discloses not only "the name, address, and telephone number of the individual or entity who shall have full authority to negotiate, amend, and modify all terms of the mortgage with the debtor" (the language that appears in the statute), but also the identity of the "secured creditor" (not required by the statutory language, but which the majority inferred based on legislative intent). The majority further found that the failure to identify the "secured creditor" in the foreclosure notice renders the notice, and any subsequent foreclosure sale, invalid as a matter of law. The dissenting judges in Reese found that the majority’s holding "amount[ed] to a judicial rewriting of [O.C.G.A. § 44-14-162.2(a)]" to mean that the notice must disclose not only the identity of the person identified in the text of the statute, but the identity of the secured creditor as well.

To read more about this topic, please see full article below

Download PDF



Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • “Gail strikes the perfect balance between protecting her client and getting the deal done in a most pleasant and efficient manner.”

    -Jim Adams, Daniel Corporation

  • "Erich is great to work with.  He has a responsiveness that is second to none.  He and his team are always focused on obtaining the best outcome for their clients in a timely and cost efficient manner.  He is experienced, hard working, client minded, professional, and just an all around great attorney."

    -Anonymous

  • “Ed Snow is ‘sensitive to our timing and fee requirements’ and ‘his work has a tangible effect on our place in the market.”

    -Chamber's USA America's Leading Lawyers for Business

  • “I know him and I have tremendous amount of respect for him. He is fairly active in automotive…"

    -Chambers 2012

  • “He is very known from a corporate tax standpoint and SEC issues. He has street smarts – he’s good at helping you get things done in the correct way and advising you on which paths to go down. He answers your questions and addresses your concerns. You go to the people that you trust and have confidence in, and for me that’s Ed.”

    -Chambers 2012