Burr Alert: Is “MATERIALLY LESS” The Same As “GROSSLY INADEQUATE”?

    December 27, 2012

    Tennessee was one of many states jumping on the debtor-protection bandwagon following disclosures of lender misconduct in the wake of the 2007 real estate market collapse.

    Background

    The legislative solution crafted into Tenn. Code Ann. 35-5-118 created a rebuttable presumption that the amount bid at a foreclosure sale equaled the fair market value of the property. Debtors could overcome this presumption by showing that the bid was "materially less" than fair market value. The statute became effective September 1, 2010. Prior to that time, the standard for setting aside foreclosures was whether the bid amount was "grossly inadequate."

    There has been much debate in legal circles as to whether the new statutory approach would pave the way for debtors to defeat or reduce deficiency judgments. In the only two cases decided since the act went into effect, both the Eastern and Middle Sections of the Court of Appeals have found in favor of the lenders.

    To read more about this topic, please see full article below

    Download PDF


    Legal Disclaimer:
    No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
    send article

    TESTIMONIALS

    • “A good lawyer with a good reputation.”

      -Chambers 2012

    • "Very good."

      -Chambers 2012

    • "I have worked most closely with Greg Harley and Read Morton. They are very thorough and very knowledgeable about our business. They inspire confidence: you just know you are in good hands when you work with them."

      -Telecommunications client

    • “Very good.”

      -Chambers 2012

    • "...He is very good.”

      -Chambers 2012