Burr Alert: Is “MATERIALLY LESS” The Same As “GROSSLY INADEQUATE”?

    December 27, 2012

    Tennessee was one of many states jumping on the debtor-protection bandwagon following disclosures of lender misconduct in the wake of the 2007 real estate market collapse.

    Background

    The legislative solution crafted into Tenn. Code Ann. 35-5-118 created a rebuttable presumption that the amount bid at a foreclosure sale equaled the fair market value of the property. Debtors could overcome this presumption by showing that the bid was "materially less" than fair market value. The statute became effective September 1, 2010. Prior to that time, the standard for setting aside foreclosures was whether the bid amount was "grossly inadequate."

    There has been much debate in legal circles as to whether the new statutory approach would pave the way for debtors to defeat or reduce deficiency judgments. In the only two cases decided since the act went into effect, both the Eastern and Middle Sections of the Court of Appeals have found in favor of the lenders.

    To read more about this topic, please see full article below

    Download PDF


    Legal Disclaimer:
    No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
    send article

    TESTIMONIALS

    • “A great lawyer, deserving of the ranking.”

      -Chambers 2012

    • “A solid real estate lawyer.”

      -Chambers 2012

    • "I have found the firm's support of my attorney to always be excellent."

      -Best Lawyers 2012

    • “Dwight is a very knowledgeable corporate lending attorney. He seems to have specific competencies around multi-bank and syndicated loans, and is fair and practical. He has a good awareness of not only legal aspects of representing a bank in a commercial loan transaction, but also an awareness of the distinction between legal and business issues and the practical implications of each."

      -Chambers 2012

    • “David Houston is very thorough and responsive. He has developed a good understanding of my company’s needs and expectations, and works to anticipate those needs in advance. David is very knowledgeable about a number of topics.”

      -Chambers 2012