Burr Alert: When is a Claim a "Claim"?

October 23, 2012


By Andrea Weed

The ability of a debtor to discharge future or unknown liabilities, or claims, in the bankruptcy process is an integral aspect of the "fresh start" envisioned by the Bankruptcy Code. However, determining when a claim is a "claim" under the Bankruptcy Code is not always simple. In light of the Code's broad definition of a "claim,"1 which includes even unmatured and unliquidated rights to payment, it is possible for unknown or future creditors to have a claim against the debtor to be administered in the bankruptcy case.2

These potential creditors – those who have been exposed to the debtor's harmful conduct or defective product but who have not suffered any resulting damages at the time of the bankruptcy case – may later find that their claims have been discharged without their knowledge, and that they cannot recover from the debtor post-bankruptcy. Accordingly, determining what constitutes a "claim" and when it arises is critical for both debtors and creditors alike. Courts across the country use different tests to make these determinations, focusing on factors such as when a claim accrues under applicable state law, the nature and timing of debtor's harmful conduct, or the nature and timing of the relationship between the debtor and the claimant giving rise to the injuries suffered.3

To read more about this topic, please see full article below

Download PDF



Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • “He is very well respected in the clinical field. He pulls his sleeves and gets involved with you.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “A litigator in the real estate department. I am very pleased with his style, and his attention to detail is quite remarkable.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “I have found the ERISA group, and especially Logan Hinkle, to be knowledgeable and very responsive as we navigate the changes in HIPAA, PPA and more recently PPACA to make sure we are in compliance and our documentation in order.  I can recommend them highly.”

    -Anonymous

  • “Dwight is a very knowledgeable corporate lending attorney. He seems to have specific competencies around multi-bank and syndicated loans, and is fair and practical. He has a good awareness of not only legal aspects of representing a bank in a commercial loan transaction, but also an awareness of the distinction between legal and business issues and the practical implications of each."

    -Chambers 2012

  • “David Houston is very thorough and responsive. He has developed a good understanding of my company’s needs and expectations, and works to anticipate those needs in advance. David is very knowledgeable about a number of topics.”

    -Chambers 2012