Compliance Strategy for Small to Midsized Companies

February 22, 2013

 

Published for Pharmaceutical Compliance Monitor

On Feb. 20, 2013, Jim Hoover’s article, “Compliance Strategy for Small to Midsized Companies,” published in the online version of Pharmaceutical Compliance Monitor. In the article, Jim discusses the basic steps that small to mid-sized pharmaceutical companies should take when conducting an internal investigation. He instructs  companies to carefully consider the scope and limits of the investigation, who should conduct the investigation, how to protect the relevant privileges, and the possible outcomes of the investigation, prior to conducting the investigation. By fully considering these factors, Jim suggests that companies will be in a better position to correct any problems identified and determine whether or not self-disclosure is warranted. For the full article, please click here.  





Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • “Tully Hazell has a keen business sense and understands how to talk with the commercial side of our business in a way that is understandable and not too laden with legalese. Tully has a strong knowledge of both our business and our industry which enables him to provide relevant responses to our questions. We also appreciate that we can always rely on Tully to provide timely responses to our requests.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “They have a wonderful real estate practice. I think they are as good as anyone in the South. They are technically excellent at what they do. The deals get done with these guys. They have a well-rounded group. Anybody we have ever referred to them has been very happy and satisfied.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “He is great. The most important thing I think is judgment, whether more aggressive or more conservative than a firm’s first inclination. Tom’s got a great sense of discretion and judgment and he clearly knows the topic area very well. We never have an issue with us having to prompt ‘try this theory’. He’s smart and very pleasant, responsive as anything.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “A good lawyer with a good reputation.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “He keeps clients’ concerns and considerations in mind. You want to make sure the representation is appropriate given the claims at issue. The things I’ve liked about is that he’s a good business attorney. He keeps in mind the concerns of the business."

    -Chambers 2012