Dixie Contractor 6,000 Audits and More: IRS and State Enforcement Efforts in Employment Tax Compliance August 10, 2012

August 10, 2012

An Introduction to the IRS’s Employment Tax National Research Project

In a 2009 report, the Government Accountability Office (the “GAO”) took the IRS to task regarding its supposed lackluster enforcement efforts in employment tax compliance. The so-called “tax gap” – the gap between taxes owed and those actually paid – was widening at this time, and employment tax issues, such as the misclassification of workers as independent contractors, were believed to play a significant part. Soon after the GAO report’s release, the IRS responded by announcing a “National Research Project” (“NRP”) – the first of its type since 1984 – to address many of the issues outlined in the report.

Referring to the NRP as a “research project” is somewhat disingenuous, however, because in reality it is more like a massive audit initiative. In the NRP, the IRS pledged to audit 6,000 U.S. companies. NRP audits have targeted, and continue to target, a broad cross-section of employers nationwide including corporations and pass-through entities, profitable entities and those in-the-red, and large and small operations. The more important issues included in NRP audits are worker classification, expense reimbursements, executive compensation (Section 409A) compliance, and fringe benefits such as company automobile usage. A sampling of these issues is addressed in this article.

To read the full article from Dixie, please click here.



Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • “Larry’s knowledge of the bankruptcy code is as good as I’ve seen in my years working with Chapter 11 cases and financially distressed companies. He also brings a practical side in resolving issues with various creditor groups. This ability to address various groups the strong and weak points in a non-confrontational manner avoids undue delay and costly litigation in many cases. However, when confrontation is unavoidable, Larry is quite the fine trial lawyer as well.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “This firm is one, if not the top firm in the Southeast. I steer all my work to Burr & Forman exclusively. I have used other attorneys on deals where conflicts may arise and those are good firms, but I still go back to Burr time and again.”

    - Chambers 2012

  • "I would give them strong marks for their responsiveness and proactive-ness. Responsiveness is an absolute necessity and proactive work is also critically important. I've found Burr to be masters on these aspects. They respond quickly, effectively and efficiently in guiding a deal to closing. Burr & Forman has always been able to deliver expertise from within its proactive group or from another partner in a different section of the firm."

    -Chambers 2012

  • “He is great. The most important thing I think is judgment, whether more aggressive or more conservative than a firm’s first inclination. Tom’s got a great sense of discretion and judgment and he clearly knows the topic area very well. We never have an issue with us having to prompt ‘try this theory’. He’s smart and very pleasant, responsive as anything.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “Gail strikes the perfect balance between protecting her client and getting the deal done in a most pleasant and efficient manner.”

    -Jim Adams, Daniel Corporation