Dixie Contractor 6,000 Audits and More: IRS and State Enforcement Efforts in Employment Tax Compliance August 10, 2012

August 10, 2012

An Introduction to the IRS’s Employment Tax National Research Project

In a 2009 report, the Government Accountability Office (the “GAO”) took the IRS to task regarding its supposed lackluster enforcement efforts in employment tax compliance. The so-called “tax gap” – the gap between taxes owed and those actually paid – was widening at this time, and employment tax issues, such as the misclassification of workers as independent contractors, were believed to play a significant part. Soon after the GAO report’s release, the IRS responded by announcing a “National Research Project” (“NRP”) – the first of its type since 1984 – to address many of the issues outlined in the report.

Referring to the NRP as a “research project” is somewhat disingenuous, however, because in reality it is more like a massive audit initiative. In the NRP, the IRS pledged to audit 6,000 U.S. companies. NRP audits have targeted, and continue to target, a broad cross-section of employers nationwide including corporations and pass-through entities, profitable entities and those in-the-red, and large and small operations. The more important issues included in NRP audits are worker classification, expense reimbursements, executive compensation (Section 409A) compliance, and fringe benefits such as company automobile usage. A sampling of these issues is addressed in this article.

To read the full article from Dixie, please click here.



Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • "...He’s terrific to work with – a very good negotiator. He is outstanding and not aggressive, which is one of the things I like about him. He is calm, factual, extremely sharp, and observant. He doesn’t miss a beat. On a very complex negotiation, we made a lot of headway due to him."

    -Chambers 2012

  • “He is great. The most important thing I think is judgment, whether more aggressive or more conservative than a firm’s first inclination. Tom’s got a great sense of discretion and judgment and he clearly knows the topic area very well. We never have an issue with us having to prompt ‘try this theory’. He’s smart and very pleasant, responsive as anything.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “He is an outstanding OSHA attorney who has been very valuable in his area of expertise.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “I have had the pleasure of working with Jay Price since 1997.  Over the years, he has provided outstanding representation for the banks I have worked for and continues to make the loan closing process a good experience for both the bank and our borrowers.  Even with the growth of Jay’s practice over the years, he always makes me feel as if I am his only client and always provides me top notch service.”

    -Anonymous

  • “I worked with Scott for 2 years on a green building project. I find his expertise in this area invaluable. Scott has a gentle yet executive demeanor, which lets him move projects forward productively while building stronger relationships.”

    -Selena Wingate