Burr Alert: Evolving Bankruptcy Jurisdiction - Ninth Circuit Rules that Bankruptcy Courts Cannot Enter Final Judgment on Fraudulent Conveyance Claims

January 24, 2013

Before the Supreme Court’s seminal ruling in Stern v. Marshall,1 bankruptcy courts regularly entered final orders in fraudulent conveyance actions and other "core"2 matters. In Stern v. Marshall, the Supreme Court ruled that despite being statutorily defined as "core" under the bankruptcy code, bankruptcy courts do not have the constitutional power to adjudicate counterclaims to proofs of claim because they are based in state law. Following the same course, the Ninth Circuit recently held in In re Bellingham Insurance Agency, Inc.,3 that a non-Article III bankruptcy judge lacks constitutional authority to enter a final judgment on a fraudulent conveyance action against a nonclaimant to a bankruptcy estate.

To read more about this topic, please see full article below:

Download PDF


Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • “A solid real estate lawyer.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “They were substantively impressive and we were also very impressed with the level of service. They put a premium on being available and turning things around quickly.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “This firm is one, if not the top firm in the Southeast. I steer all my work to Burr & Forman exclusively. I have used other attorneys on deals where conflicts may arise and those are good firms, but I still go back to Burr time and again.”

    - Chambers 2012

  • “His professionalism, responsiveness, efficiency and depth of knowledge have impressed me."

    -Chambers 2012

  • “She is very competent in advising us on the deal – many of us didn’t realize the significance or the terminology. She is very thorough and is very good at explaining how the deals worked and what it was.”

    -Chambers 2012