Burr Alert: Evolving Bankruptcy Jurisdiction - Ninth Circuit Rules that Bankruptcy Courts Cannot Enter Final Judgment on Fraudulent Conveyance Claims

January 24, 2013

Before the Supreme Court’s seminal ruling in Stern v. Marshall,1 bankruptcy courts regularly entered final orders in fraudulent conveyance actions and other "core"2 matters. In Stern v. Marshall, the Supreme Court ruled that despite being statutorily defined as "core" under the bankruptcy code, bankruptcy courts do not have the constitutional power to adjudicate counterclaims to proofs of claim because they are based in state law. Following the same course, the Ninth Circuit recently held in In re Bellingham Insurance Agency, Inc.,3 that a non-Article III bankruptcy judge lacks constitutional authority to enter a final judgment on a fraudulent conveyance action against a nonclaimant to a bankruptcy estate.

To read more about this topic, please see full article below:

Download PDF


Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • "...Everything they did was first class. We relied on their expertise and went with their advice.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “She’s got a good reputation.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • "Rik Tozzi . . . adds further strength to this talented team and has been integral to the group's ongoing representation . . . in relation to a potential $200 million RICO class action."

    -Chambers 2012

  • “One of the most active in town. A good guy.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “My primary contacts at the firm are Doug Anderson and John Kavanagh. Doug assists in real estate matters and John assists in maritime and litigation matters. Both are outstanding attorneys with a wealth of knowledge in their areas. They both have many strengths, but the most valuable quality is their practical, no nonsense and efficient approach to all issues.”

    -Chambers 2012