Burr Alert: Evolving Bankruptcy Jurisdiction - Ninth Circuit Rules that Bankruptcy Courts Cannot Enter Final Judgment on Fraudulent Conveyance Claims

January 24, 2013

Before the Supreme Court’s seminal ruling in Stern v. Marshall,1 bankruptcy courts regularly entered final orders in fraudulent conveyance actions and other "core"2 matters. In Stern v. Marshall, the Supreme Court ruled that despite being statutorily defined as "core" under the bankruptcy code, bankruptcy courts do not have the constitutional power to adjudicate counterclaims to proofs of claim because they are based in state law. Following the same course, the Ninth Circuit recently held in In re Bellingham Insurance Agency, Inc.,3 that a non-Article III bankruptcy judge lacks constitutional authority to enter a final judgment on a fraudulent conveyance action against a nonclaimant to a bankruptcy estate.

To read more about this topic, please see full article below:

Download PDF


Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • “Graham Stieglitz and his firm are my go-to guys for bankruptcy related matters.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “He is very well respected in the clinical field. He pulls his sleeves and gets involved with you.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “Ed is good at learning your business and tailoring their work to your need. He is a business-minded lawyer – definitely a leader in our business. If anyone asked me to recommend a firm I’d send them to Ed. He’ll do whatever you need him to do – he works till ten at night and jumps on a place with no notice. He’s just great.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “He is efficient and understands me. He knows the balance between legal and business aspects.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • "Burr & Forman lawyers are high paced and thorough in development and handling of complex issues in land use litigation."

    -Best Lawyers 2012