Burr Alert: Evolving Bankruptcy Jurisdiction - Ninth Circuit Rules that Bankruptcy Courts Cannot Enter Final Judgment on Fraudulent Conveyance Claims

January 24, 2013

Before the Supreme Court’s seminal ruling in Stern v. Marshall,1 bankruptcy courts regularly entered final orders in fraudulent conveyance actions and other "core"2 matters. In Stern v. Marshall, the Supreme Court ruled that despite being statutorily defined as "core" under the bankruptcy code, bankruptcy courts do not have the constitutional power to adjudicate counterclaims to proofs of claim because they are based in state law. Following the same course, the Ninth Circuit recently held in In re Bellingham Insurance Agency, Inc.,3 that a non-Article III bankruptcy judge lacks constitutional authority to enter a final judgment on a fraudulent conveyance action against a nonclaimant to a bankruptcy estate.

To read more about this topic, please see full article below:

Download PDF


Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • “She is very competent in advising us on the deal – many of us didn’t realize the significance or the terminology. She is very thorough and is very good at explaining how the deals worked and what it was.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • "Burr & Forman has a very good understanding of business needs with focus on producing tangible results. They always provide solid practical advice without losing sight of the big picture."

    -Best Lawyers 2012

  • "The Burr & Forman Creditor's Rights group is top notch and definitely should be ranked with the nation's best lawyers. They are responsive, timely, very knowledgeable, resourceful, and helpful. They fight for their clients while offering alternative strategies that may be less expensive. That being said, they will "go to the mat" if necessary and do so in a prudent well prepared manner."

    -Best Lawyers 2012

  • “He is very well respected in the clinical field. He pulls his sleeves and gets involved with you.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “I have always been impressed by Jack. He has a quality that many lawyers that I have worked with in the past do not possess. He sees the matters from a business perspective while incorporating his legal skills in the matter. Additionally, he is always very responsive to any question or problem we have, and I believe that he truly cares about our firm’s success.”

    -Chambers 2012