Burr Alert: Evolving Bankruptcy Jurisdiction - Ninth Circuit Rules that Bankruptcy Courts Cannot Enter Final Judgment on Fraudulent Conveyance Claims

January 24, 2013

Before the Supreme Court’s seminal ruling in Stern v. Marshall,1 bankruptcy courts regularly entered final orders in fraudulent conveyance actions and other "core"2 matters. In Stern v. Marshall, the Supreme Court ruled that despite being statutorily defined as "core" under the bankruptcy code, bankruptcy courts do not have the constitutional power to adjudicate counterclaims to proofs of claim because they are based in state law. Following the same course, the Ninth Circuit recently held in In re Bellingham Insurance Agency, Inc.,3 that a non-Article III bankruptcy judge lacks constitutional authority to enter a final judgment on a fraudulent conveyance action against a nonclaimant to a bankruptcy estate.

To read more about this topic, please see full article below:

Download PDF

Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article


  • “A good lawyer with a good reputation.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “Very responsive. An excellent lawyer with a lot of experience."

    -Chambers 2012

  • “He is an excellent products liability lawyer. He is good in front of a jury, always prepared. He is recognized as an excellent lawyer.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • "Ed, thank you for all of your help, advice, and the out-of-the-box approach.  I enjoy and appreciate the way you think and your non-nonsense attitude, and I plan to leverage your expertise and experience for many years to come."

    - Etienne Terblanche, dataLogistics Corporation

  • “I work with a lot of lawyers in several states and Greg Harley is one of my favorites; he makes my job easy. He is very efficient, responsive and gets good results for us. I am very pleased.”

    -In-house counsel for a national banking institution