Intercreditor Agreements in Bankruptcy

November 20, 2012

 

An "intercreditor agreement" can be defined as an agreement that sets forth the relative rights, priorities and remedies among one or more lenders with respect to one or more common debtors. The enforceability of an intercreditor agreement in the context of a bankruptcy case is addressed in Section 510(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, which provides that “[a] subordination agreement is enforceable in a case under this title to the same extent that such agreement is enforceable under applicable nonbankruptcy law.” 11 U.S.C. § 510(a). In view of this seemingly clear, unambiguous language, it would seem that courts considering the enforceability of subordination agreements in the context of a bankruptcy case would only need to review and apply relevant nonbankruptcy law. However, whether an intercreditor agreement is a subordination agreement included within the protection of 11 U.S.C. § 510(a) is a valid question. In fact, earlier case law addressing the enforceability of a subordination agreement, or at least some of its provisions, in the context of a bankruptcy case concluded that the scope of Section 510(a) of the Bankruptcy Code is far narrower than meets the eye.

To read more about this topic, please see full article below

Download PDF


Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • “He’s really a very, very good securities lawyer…"

    -Chambers 2012

  • "...He’s terrific to work with – a very good negotiator. He is outstanding and not aggressive, which is one of the things I like about him. He is calm, factual, extremely sharp, and observant. He doesn’t miss a beat. On a very complex negotiation, we made a lot of headway due to him."

    -Chambers 2012

  • “I have worked with Chris Linde and Eric Golden on two separate legal matters.  In both, their level headedness and systematic approach to the various outcomes were planned and continually communicated with me. I felt very much a part of the process. While the legal process was drawn out due to the court system, Chris and Eric made the process as smooth as possible and never promised anything they knew they couldn't deliver on.  I highly recommend both of them for legal issues and will definitely retain them again on new issues that may arise.”

    -John Lehr, MD

  • “The coordination between each individual attorney appeared smooth. I was happy with the client service.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • "The best firm I've dealt with. They are full-service and they can do everything. They are fair in their pricing. They are respectful, courteous and timely. I can't say good enough things about them."

    -Chambers 2012