Intercreditor Agreements in Bankruptcy

November 20, 2012

 

An "intercreditor agreement" can be defined as an agreement that sets forth the relative rights, priorities and remedies among one or more lenders with respect to one or more common debtors. The enforceability of an intercreditor agreement in the context of a bankruptcy case is addressed in Section 510(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, which provides that “[a] subordination agreement is enforceable in a case under this title to the same extent that such agreement is enforceable under applicable nonbankruptcy law.” 11 U.S.C. § 510(a). In view of this seemingly clear, unambiguous language, it would seem that courts considering the enforceability of subordination agreements in the context of a bankruptcy case would only need to review and apply relevant nonbankruptcy law. However, whether an intercreditor agreement is a subordination agreement included within the protection of 11 U.S.C. § 510(a) is a valid question. In fact, earlier case law addressing the enforceability of a subordination agreement, or at least some of its provisions, in the context of a bankruptcy case concluded that the scope of Section 510(a) of the Bankruptcy Code is far narrower than meets the eye.

To read more about this topic, please see full article below

Download PDF


Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • "...In terms of bang for the buck they are one of our best firms."

    -Chambers 2012

  • "Burr & Forman lawyers are high paced and thorough in development and handling of complex issues in land use litigation."

    -Best Lawyers 2012

  • “Callie is thorough, efficient and dependable.  She explains the details of contract law in terms that we can understand allowing us to make the business decisions that are essential for our success.  During contract negotiations with our customers, Callie is always courteous while maintaining the proficiency and firmness required to effectively represent the interests of American.”

    -Jon Noland, Sales Manager, Steel Pipe Division, American Cast Iron Pipe Company

  • “Scott generously provided advice and assistance to our small startup. He was responsive to our needs and tolerant of adjustments we requested throughout the development of our operating agreement. We’re probably one of Scott’s smallest clients, but he offered our startup his full attention and consideration as if we were one of his largest. We’re grateful for his help.”

    -Sam Pugh

  • “He is a great real estate lawyer. He is practical as opposed to a theorist. He has common sense and is a problem-solving real estate attorney. His demeanor is very calm – he doesn’t overreact and thinks through the issue before he starts talking about it. He is calm, steady and persistent. I have recommended him to others and they have used him too. He is a prize, the kind of attorney you want – not throw his weight around, not center of attention, calmly deal with, keep it low key and move it forward. He evaluates things and possible compromises. He just gets what you need done. I don’t know all real estate lawyers but I know a lot of them, he is as good as any of them.”

    -Chambers 2012