Intercreditor Agreements in Bankruptcy

November 20, 2012


An "intercreditor agreement" can be defined as an agreement that sets forth the relative rights, priorities and remedies among one or more lenders with respect to one or more common debtors. The enforceability of an intercreditor agreement in the context of a bankruptcy case is addressed in Section 510(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, which provides that “[a] subordination agreement is enforceable in a case under this title to the same extent that such agreement is enforceable under applicable nonbankruptcy law.” 11 U.S.C. § 510(a). In view of this seemingly clear, unambiguous language, it would seem that courts considering the enforceability of subordination agreements in the context of a bankruptcy case would only need to review and apply relevant nonbankruptcy law. However, whether an intercreditor agreement is a subordination agreement included within the protection of 11 U.S.C. § 510(a) is a valid question. In fact, earlier case law addressing the enforceability of a subordination agreement, or at least some of its provisions, in the context of a bankruptcy case concluded that the scope of Section 510(a) of the Bankruptcy Code is far narrower than meets the eye.

To read more about this topic, please see full article below

Download PDF

Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article


  • “He is dependable, intelligent, resourceful and efficient. I’m always confident that when I assign a case to him, it will be handled properly. I highly endorse him.”

    -General Counsel for a diversified services company

  • “Scott generously provided advice and assistance to our small startup. He was responsive to our needs and tolerant of adjustments we requested throughout the development of our operating agreement. We’re probably one of Scott’s smallest clients, but he offered our startup his full attention and consideration as if we were one of his largest. We’re grateful for his help.”

    -Sam Pugh

  • “I think they’re great. They cost dramatically less but still offer a full suite of services. They have all the wherewithal to get work done without the New York rates.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “He is an outstanding OSHA attorney who has been very valuable in his area of expertise.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “He is very known from a corporate tax standpoint and SEC issues. He has street smarts – he’s good at helping you get things done in the correct way and advising you on which paths to go down. He answers your questions and addresses your concerns. You go to the people that you trust and have confidence in, and for me that’s Ed.”

    -Chambers 2012