Intercreditor Agreements in Bankruptcy

November 20, 2012

 

An "intercreditor agreement" can be defined as an agreement that sets forth the relative rights, priorities and remedies among one or more lenders with respect to one or more common debtors. The enforceability of an intercreditor agreement in the context of a bankruptcy case is addressed in Section 510(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, which provides that “[a] subordination agreement is enforceable in a case under this title to the same extent that such agreement is enforceable under applicable nonbankruptcy law.” 11 U.S.C. § 510(a). In view of this seemingly clear, unambiguous language, it would seem that courts considering the enforceability of subordination agreements in the context of a bankruptcy case would only need to review and apply relevant nonbankruptcy law. However, whether an intercreditor agreement is a subordination agreement included within the protection of 11 U.S.C. § 510(a) is a valid question. In fact, earlier case law addressing the enforceability of a subordination agreement, or at least some of its provisions, in the context of a bankruptcy case concluded that the scope of Section 510(a) of the Bankruptcy Code is far narrower than meets the eye.

To read more about this topic, please see full article below

Download PDF


Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • “Clifton and I have worked together on multiple matters over the years. He makes my job easier by being attentive and responsive to my needs. Clifton does a great job in explaining convoluted situations in laymen's terms, and he's quick to spot areas of leverage and concern.”

    -Synovus Financial Corporation, Senior Regional Credit Manager - Special Assets

  • “We frequently call on Kristin to provide us with guidance on various employee situations, from hiring to firing and all that goes in between.  Not only is Kristin extremely knowledgeable in the employment law arena, but we appreciate the fact that Kristin does not take a “one size fits all” approach with her clients.  Instead, she took the time to learn and know our company, so that her legal advice is always rendered after having been tailored for the specific needs of and in consideration of the character that is Southeast Roofing’s alone.” 

    -Southeast Roofing and Construction, Inc.

  • “Very competent. She’s often regarded as the queen of the bankruptcy court in central Florida. She is very well respected and very well versed in the bankruptcy code. Her mind is more focused on the legal aspects of things and she has an ability to work on deals outside court.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “I have an excellent working relationship with a number of attorneys at the firm, all of whom I trust to handle our problems. Even at a generously negotiated rate, we pay the attorneys at Burr & Forman a slightly higher rate than we pay other attorneys for similar services. We are willing to pay that premium because of the firm’s competence in so many areas, whereas other smaller firms tend to specialize in areas and have weaknesses in others.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • Owner/President told Ed, "I want to retain you in this case because you are a finisher."

    -Hosea O. Weaver & Sons, Inc.