Intercreditor Agreements in Bankruptcy

November 20, 2012

 

An "intercreditor agreement" can be defined as an agreement that sets forth the relative rights, priorities and remedies among one or more lenders with respect to one or more common debtors. The enforceability of an intercreditor agreement in the context of a bankruptcy case is addressed in Section 510(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, which provides that “[a] subordination agreement is enforceable in a case under this title to the same extent that such agreement is enforceable under applicable nonbankruptcy law.” 11 U.S.C. § 510(a). In view of this seemingly clear, unambiguous language, it would seem that courts considering the enforceability of subordination agreements in the context of a bankruptcy case would only need to review and apply relevant nonbankruptcy law. However, whether an intercreditor agreement is a subordination agreement included within the protection of 11 U.S.C. § 510(a) is a valid question. In fact, earlier case law addressing the enforceability of a subordination agreement, or at least some of its provisions, in the context of a bankruptcy case concluded that the scope of Section 510(a) of the Bankruptcy Code is far narrower than meets the eye.

To read more about this topic, please see full article below

Download PDF


Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • “I have a lot of respect for him. He runs cases efficiently and manages matters well. He takes a very practical approach and is easy to work with. He has distinguished himself…"

    -Chambers 2012

  • "John Kavanagh is hands down a market leader. You will be hard pressed to find a better litigator. I consider him a rare gem in the attorney world, as he can manage a crisis from its inception all the way through to any resulting litigation. That is, his inherent and learned abilities help him mitigate client risk at every step of a crisis."

    -Chambers 2013

  • “Robert Rutherford, David Elliott and John Chiles have all done this kind of work over the years. They are all very good lawyers and do a very good job."

    -Chambers 2012

  • “Ed is excellent. He is very responsive and provides us with direct and concise legal opinions. His business understanding combined with his legal skills are invaluable to us. He runs a very professional practice. His personal touch is complimented by his very able legal assistant Denease Mallett. The firm is well respected.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “He is very known from a corporate tax standpoint and SEC issues. He has street smarts – he’s good at helping you get things done in the correct way and advising you on which paths to go down. He answers your questions and addresses your concerns. You go to the people that you trust and have confidence in, and for me that’s Ed.”

    -Chambers 2012