Burr Alert: Preemption of State Consumer Protection Laws Under the Dodd-Frank Act

February 19, 2013

 

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act” or the “Act”), signed into law in 2010, contains a series of regulatory reforms aimed in part to combat what was perceived as lax financial regulation that led to the recession of the late 2000’s.1 One way the Dodd-Frank Act seeks to tighten the reins on national banking institutions is by strengthening the legal standards for the preemption of state laws, thereby making it harder for banks to avoid liability under state law. Whereas prior to Dodd-Frank’s enactment, national banking institutions enjoyed heavy deference in the area of preemption of state laws, Dodd-Frank curbs this deference by requiring a case by case determination of preemption and requiring that a state consumer financial services law conflict with the exercise of a national bank’s powers before the state law can be preempted. Further, the Dodd-Frank Act strips subsidiaries of national banks of the same preemption protection enjoyed by national banks and subjects federally-chartered savings banks and federally-regulated savings associations to the same preemption standards as those applicable to national banks. The mandated “case by case” determination standard injects much uncertainty into the preemption analysis and ensures much preemption litigation for years to come.

Download full alert




Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • “He has an in-depth understanding of creditors’ rights law and bankruptcy law. He is extremely responsive and is capable of seeing the business side of workouts, not just the legal side. He helps come up with a solution that is often times mutually acceptable to both sides and is tremendously successful in all the work he’d done. By far my favorite bankruptcy lawyer in Florida.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “Our firm has used Burr & Forman, and particularly Logan Hinkle, for our retirement plan and many employment law issues over the years.  I have always found their entire staff of lawyers, paralegals and assistants to be knowledgeable and just as importantly prompt in their response to our questions or concerns.  They have always kept us abreast of changes in the law and suggest changes that we should make in our employment practices, or our retirement plan, to keep current and compliant.  Our relationship has always been professional but at the same time very cordial and respectful.  Our association with Logan and his partners, associates and colleagues has been outstanding.”

    -John D. Humber, Tuscaloosa Radiology

  • "...He has written a lot about Alabama employment law. Probably the leader of the group at Burr & Forman.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “Mike Atchison is a gentleman and has a great legal mind. We use him for highly complex advisory work.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “They were substantively impressive and we were also very impressed with the level of service. They put a premium on being available and turning things around quickly.”

    -Chambers 2012