Washington Legal Foundation: STATE HIGH COURT RULINGS INDICATIVE OF ALABAMA’S CIVIL JUSTICE TURNAROUND

October 05, 2012

By: Forrest Latta

Alabama’s tort system is winning attention again, except this time for reasons opposite twenty years ago when it earned a dangerous reputation. The distance traveled can be seen in a recent decision by the Alabama Supreme Court, Sandoz, Inc. v. State of Alabama, 2012 WL 2866764 (July 13, 2012), which reversed a $78.4 million verdict against a pharmaceutical manufacturer.

The Sandoz decision is a victory for the rule of law, as well as another cautionary tale for states who would consider hiring outside contingency-fee lawyers to aggressively pursue “regulation by litigation.” It also is a healthy sign of Alabama’s turnaround, paralleled—not coincidentally—by major business growth in the state including the announcement of Airbus’s recent decision to locate a U.S. manufacturing facility there.

It was almost two decades ago, in 1993, when author David Frum published an alarming column in Forbes magazine entitled “Unreformed,” recounting how Alabama had become the “worst place in America to be a civil defendant.” A similar article in Time labeled Alabama as “tort hell,” a place “where corporate America bleeds for the public good.” Such news sent businesses scrambling for the exits, inspiring a new literary genre (state tort rankings), and ushering in a tort reform movement that has become a cottage industry.

To read more about this topic, please see full article here.



Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • "V. J. has earned a reputation as a hard working and well respected litigator who is also extensively involved in the Birmingham community."

    -Chief Operating Officer and former General Counsel for national financial services firm

  • “This firm is one, if not the top firm in the Southeast. I steer all my work to Burr & Forman exclusively. I have used other attorneys on deals where conflicts may arise and those are good firms, but I still go back to Burr time and again.”

    - Chambers 2012

  • "Erich has a keen legal mind such that he is able to easily translate complex legal issues into simple layman's terms.  I view him as a trusted counsel who is also very responsive and easy to work with.  I highly recommend him."

    -Anonymous

  • “Ed is excellent. He is very responsive and provides us with direct and concise legal opinions. His business understanding combined with his legal skills are invaluable to us. He runs a very professional practice. His personal touch is complimented by his very able legal assistant Denease Mallett. The firm is well respected.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “We think they are really excellent. Responsiveness is extremely important to me. I’m very demanding, I have to be, and I make that crystal clear to who I work with because I’d go elsewhere otherwise. I need proper, quick response times, not just within 24 hours. Our commercial needs are very much taken into account. They are extremely aware of business practicalities as well as legal technicalities. They provide excellent value. They are flexible and we’ve been happy. We are really very pleased.”

    -Chambers 2012