Washington Legal Foundation: STATE HIGH COURT RULINGS INDICATIVE OF ALABAMA’S CIVIL JUSTICE TURNAROUND

October 05, 2012

By: Forrest Latta

Alabama’s tort system is winning attention again, except this time for reasons opposite twenty years ago when it earned a dangerous reputation. The distance traveled can be seen in a recent decision by the Alabama Supreme Court, Sandoz, Inc. v. State of Alabama, 2012 WL 2866764 (July 13, 2012), which reversed a $78.4 million verdict against a pharmaceutical manufacturer.

The Sandoz decision is a victory for the rule of law, as well as another cautionary tale for states who would consider hiring outside contingency-fee lawyers to aggressively pursue “regulation by litigation.” It also is a healthy sign of Alabama’s turnaround, paralleled—not coincidentally—by major business growth in the state including the announcement of Airbus’s recent decision to locate a U.S. manufacturing facility there.

It was almost two decades ago, in 1993, when author David Frum published an alarming column in Forbes magazine entitled “Unreformed,” recounting how Alabama had become the “worst place in America to be a civil defendant.” A similar article in Time labeled Alabama as “tort hell,” a place “where corporate America bleeds for the public good.” Such news sent businesses scrambling for the exits, inspiring a new literary genre (state tort rankings), and ushering in a tort reform movement that has become a cottage industry.

To read more about this topic, please see full article here.



Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • “He is an excellent products liability lawyer. He is good in front of a jury, always prepared. He is recognized as an excellent lawyer.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • "Jackie is a bright attorney and a key part of our team.  She is always willing to do whatever it takes to get the job done and to make sure that our clients are happy with the job we are doing."

    -R. Frank Springfield (Partner)

  • “As a client of Burr & Forman, I feel that my organization has excellent representation.  I have consulted with Amy Jordan and Bryance Metheny on numerous issues and have always found them both to be very responsive and to clarify legal matters or concerns with a sense of urgency. Specifically, Amy has handled our EEOC claims with the utmost attention to detail and has been the reason that we were successful in defending our EEOC claims with the level of success that we have had thus far.

    When we were being inundated with unemployment decisions favoring former employees, Bryance and Amy met with our Human Resources team to instruct us on the specifics of the section of law and we have had great success in turning our experience rating and saving our company a great deal in unemployment costs.  My organization relies heavily on the attorneys at Burr & Forman to provide legal advice as it relates to our strategic initiatives and to decrease our liability as an employer.”

    -Catherine Houston, Director of Human Resources, CLP Corporation

  • “He is great. The most important thing I think is judgment, whether more aggressive or more conservative than a firm’s first inclination. Tom’s got a great sense of discretion and judgment and he clearly knows the topic area very well. We never have an issue with us having to prompt ‘try this theory’. He’s smart and very pleasant, responsive as anything.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “Callie is thorough, efficient and dependable.  She explains the details of contract law in terms that we can understand allowing us to make the business decisions that are essential for our success.  During contract negotiations with our customers, Callie is always courteous while maintaining the proficiency and firmness required to effectively represent the interests of American.”

    -Jon Noland, Sales Manager, Steel Pipe Division, American Cast Iron Pipe Company