Washington Legal Foundation: STATE HIGH COURT RULINGS INDICATIVE OF ALABAMA’S CIVIL JUSTICE TURNAROUND

October 05, 2012

By: Forrest Latta

Alabama’s tort system is winning attention again, except this time for reasons opposite twenty years ago when it earned a dangerous reputation. The distance traveled can be seen in a recent decision by the Alabama Supreme Court, Sandoz, Inc. v. State of Alabama, 2012 WL 2866764 (July 13, 2012), which reversed a $78.4 million verdict against a pharmaceutical manufacturer.

The Sandoz decision is a victory for the rule of law, as well as another cautionary tale for states who would consider hiring outside contingency-fee lawyers to aggressively pursue “regulation by litigation.” It also is a healthy sign of Alabama’s turnaround, paralleled—not coincidentally—by major business growth in the state including the announcement of Airbus’s recent decision to locate a U.S. manufacturing facility there.

It was almost two decades ago, in 1993, when author David Frum published an alarming column in Forbes magazine entitled “Unreformed,” recounting how Alabama had become the “worst place in America to be a civil defendant.” A similar article in Time labeled Alabama as “tort hell,” a place “where corporate America bleeds for the public good.” Such news sent businesses scrambling for the exits, inspiring a new literary genre (state tort rankings), and ushering in a tort reform movement that has become a cottage industry.

To read more about this topic, please see full article here.



Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • “He is an outstanding OSHA attorney who has been very valuable in his area of expertise.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “My primary contacts at the firm are Doug Anderson and John Kavanagh. Doug assists in real estate matters and John assists in maritime and litigation matters. Both are outstanding attorneys with a wealth of knowledge in their areas. They both have many strengths, but the most valuable quality is their practical, no nonsense and efficient approach to all issues.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “I have ultimate trust and complete confidence in them. They have legal abilities and are culturally involved in what we are interested in, that sets them apart…"

    -Chambers 2012

  • “He is great. The most important thing I think is judgment, whether more aggressive or more conservative than a firm’s first inclination. Tom’s got a great sense of discretion and judgment and he clearly knows the topic area very well. We never have an issue with us having to prompt ‘try this theory’. He’s smart and very pleasant, responsive as anything.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “I know him and I have tremendous amount of respect for him. He is fairly active in automotive…"

    -Chambers 2012