Washington Legal Foundation: STATE HIGH COURT RULINGS INDICATIVE OF ALABAMA’S CIVIL JUSTICE TURNAROUND

October 05, 2012

By: Forrest Latta

Alabama’s tort system is winning attention again, except this time for reasons opposite twenty years ago when it earned a dangerous reputation. The distance traveled can be seen in a recent decision by the Alabama Supreme Court, Sandoz, Inc. v. State of Alabama, 2012 WL 2866764 (July 13, 2012), which reversed a $78.4 million verdict against a pharmaceutical manufacturer.

The Sandoz decision is a victory for the rule of law, as well as another cautionary tale for states who would consider hiring outside contingency-fee lawyers to aggressively pursue “regulation by litigation.” It also is a healthy sign of Alabama’s turnaround, paralleled—not coincidentally—by major business growth in the state including the announcement of Airbus’s recent decision to locate a U.S. manufacturing facility there.

It was almost two decades ago, in 1993, when author David Frum published an alarming column in Forbes magazine entitled “Unreformed,” recounting how Alabama had become the “worst place in America to be a civil defendant.” A similar article in Time labeled Alabama as “tort hell,” a place “where corporate America bleeds for the public good.” Such news sent businesses scrambling for the exits, inspiring a new literary genre (state tort rankings), and ushering in a tort reform movement that has become a cottage industry.

To read more about this topic, please see full article here.



Legal Disclaimer:
No representation is made that the quality of services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Featured Attorneys

send article

TESTIMONIALS

  • “He is a great real estate lawyer. He is practical as opposed to a theorist. He has common sense and is a problem-solving real estate attorney. His demeanor is very calm – he doesn’t overreact and thinks through the issue before he starts talking about it. He is calm, steady and persistent. I have recommended him to others and they have used him too. He is a prize, the kind of attorney you want – not throw his weight around, not center of attention, calmly deal with, keep it low key and move it forward. He evaluates things and possible compromises. He just gets what you need done. I don’t know all real estate lawyers but I know a lot of them, he is as good as any of them.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “He keeps clients’ concerns and considerations in mind. You want to make sure the representation is appropriate given the claims at issue. The things I’ve liked about is that he’s a good business attorney. He keeps in mind the concerns of the business."

    -Chambers 2012

  • “One of the most active in town. A good guy.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “He does a good job for his clients.”

    -Chambers 2012

  • “He is an excellent attorney, a very good litigator. He has a very good and calm demeanor and doesn’t get wild. He keeps his cool and continues to pile on. He is a good planner in terms of strategy."

    -Chambers 2012