<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
			<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='https://www.burr.com/consumer-finance-litigation/rss.xsl' ?>
			<rss version='2.0' xmlns:content='http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/'
					xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'
					xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>
				<channel>
					<title>Consumer Finance Litigation Blog | Burr &amp; Forman LLP</title>
					<link>https://www.burr.com/consumer-finance-litigation/2021/</link>
					<atom:link href='https://www.burr.com/consumer-finance-litigation/2021/?rss' rel='self' type='application/rss+xml' />
					<description><![CDATA[The latest updates to Consumer Finance Litigation Blog.]]></description>
					<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 01:42:25 -0400</lastBuildDate>
					
				<item>
				<title>Eleventh Circuit Vacates FDCPA Ruling, Will Rehear Case En Banc</title>
				<link>https://www.burr.com/consumer-finance-litigation/eleventh-circuit-vacates-fdcpa-ruling-will-rehear-case-en-banc</link>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>eleventh-circuit-vacates-fdcpa-ruling-will-rehear-case-en-banc</guid>

					<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2021 09:00:01 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>In the latest development in <a href="https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca11/19-14434/19-14434-2021-04-21.html"><em>Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc.</em>, Case No. 19-14434</a>, the full Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has vacated the previous panel&rsquo;s opinion and will rehear the case en banc at a later date. In the original <em>Hunstein</em> opinion, the court reversed the dismissal of an action brought under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (&ldquo;FDCPA&rdquo;) that alleged a debt collector had violated the third-party disclosure provisions of the FDCPA by using a third-party mail vendor. The decision sent shockwaves through the debt collection&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Communicating with Consumers after the CFPB's Debt Collection Final Rules
Take Effect</title>
				<link>https://www.burr.com/consumer-finance-litigation/communicating-with-consumers-after-the-cfpbs-debt-collection-final-rules-take-effect</link>
<dc:creator>Alan D. Leeth</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>communicating-with-consumers-after-the-cfpbs-debt-collection-final-rules-take-effect</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2021 09:00:02 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On November 30, 2021, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection's ("CFPB") October and December 2020 Final Rules take effect. Among other things, the October and December 2020 Final Rules address communications with consumers under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"). Created in 1977, the FDCPA was intended to "eliminate abusive debt collection practices by debt collectors, to insure that those debt collectors who refrain from using abusive debt collection practices are not competitively disadvantaged, and to promote consistent state action to protect&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Seventh Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment on Fair Debt Collection Practices
Claim Reasoning Lack of Standing</title>
				<link>https://www.burr.com/consumer-finance-litigation/seventh-circuit-reverses-summary-judgment-on-fair-debt-collection-practices-claim-reasoning-lack-of-standing</link>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>seventh-circuit-reverses-summary-judgment-on-fair-debt-collection-practices-claim-reasoning-lack-of-standing</guid>

					<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 09:00:03 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On August 31, 2021, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a summary judgment decision from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, and remanded the action with instructions to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. <em>See Wadsworth v. Kross, Lieberman &amp; Stone, Inc.</em>, No. 19-1400, 2021 WL 3877930 (7th Cir. 2021). The Seventh Circuit reasoned Plaintiff&rsquo;s lack of Article III standing with respect to her claims brought pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (&ldquo;FDCPA&rdquo;), 15 U.S.C. &sect;&nbsp;&sect;&nbsp;1692 <em>et seq</em>.</p> <p>As background&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Alabama District Court Dismisses FCRA Claim Based on Alleged Failure to
Remove Dispute Notation</title>
				<link>https://www.burr.com/consumer-finance-litigation/alabama-district-court-dismisses-fcra-claim-based-on-alleged-failure-to-remove-dispute-notation</link>
<dc:creator>Kristen Peters Watson</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>alabama-district-court-dismisses-fcra-claim-based-on-alleged-failure-to-remove-dispute-notation</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 09:00:04 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama joined a growing number of courts dismissing FCRA claims based upon a furnisher&rsquo;s alleged failure to remove an &ldquo;account in dispute&rdquo; notation from consumer credit reports.&nbsp; In <em>Griffin v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.</em>, No. 1:20-cv-801-RAH-SMD, 2021 WL 3782141 (M.D. Ala. Aug. 26, 2021), the plaintiff had four accounts that were marked as &ldquo;in dispute.&rdquo;&nbsp; The plaintiff decided to dispute the &ldquo;account in dispute&rdquo; notation by contacting consumer reporting agencies (CRAs) rather than the furnishers&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Sixth Circuit Dismisses FDCPA Voicemail Case For Lack of Standing</title>
				<link>https://www.burr.com/consumer-finance-litigation/sixth-circuit-dismisses-fdcpa-voicemail-case-for-lack-of-standing</link>
<dc:creator>Rachel R. Friedman</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>sixth-circuit-dismisses-fdcpa-voicemail-case-for-lack-of-standing</guid>

					<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:00:05 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>In line with the recent trend of courts giving increased scrutiny to standing in consumer finance cases, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal this week under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (&ldquo;FDCPA&rdquo;) for lack of Article III standing in <a href="https://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/21a0182p-06.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Ward v. National Patient Account Services Solutions, Inc.</em></a>, No. 20-5902, 2021 WL 3616067, -- F.4th -- (6th Cir. Aug. 16, 2021).&nbsp; The plaintiff alleged that NPAS, Inc. left him voicemails regarding his medical debt which simply identified itself as &ldquo;NPAS&rdquo; rather than &ldquo;NPAS, Inc.,&rdquo; which confused him as to the correct&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Investigating and Defending Identity Theft Claims Against Furnishers Under
The Fair Credit Reporting Act</title>
				<link>https://www.burr.com/consumer-finance-litigation/investigating-and-defending-identity-theft-claims-against-furnishers-under-the-fair-credit-reporting-act</link>
<dc:creator>David A. Elliott, Ryli Wallace Leader</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>investigating-and-defending-identity-theft-claims-against-furnishers-under-the-fair-credit-reporting-act</guid>

					<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 09:00:06 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) was enacted to promote the accuracy, fairness, and privacy of information maintained by Consumer Reporting Agencies (CRAs).&nbsp; In addition to imposing duties on the CRAs, it requires furnishers of information to provide accurate and complete information to the CRAs and to investigate any consumer disputes regarding the accuracy of that information.&nbsp; Increased claims of identity theft by consumers have given rise to more disputes that accounts are not accurately being reported as belonging to those consumers.&nbsp; These &ldquo;identity theft&rdquo;&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Upcoming Webinar: How to Defend Identity Theft Claims Under the FCRA</title>
				<link>https://www.burr.com/consumer-finance-litigation/upcoming-webinar-how-to-defend-identity-theft-claims-under-the-fcra</link>
<dc:creator>David A. Elliott, Ryli Wallace Leader, Zachary D. Miller</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>upcoming-webinar-how-to-defend-identity-theft-claims-under-the-fcra</guid>

					<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:00:07 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Increased claims of identity theft by consumers have given rise to more disputes that accounts are being inaccurately reported. Our clients are seeing a dramatic increase in the number of identity theft-related FCRA lawsuits. To learn more, please join us for a webinar, "How to Defend Identity Theft Claims Under the FCRA" on Wednesday, August 4 from 11:30 am to 12:30 pm CDT. Panelists will discuss critical elements to a reasonable identity theft investigation and techniques for defending FCRA claims related to identity theft.</p> <p>Panelists will also cover the duties of a furnisher of&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Biden Administration Announces Mortgage Relief as Foreclosure Moratorium
Comes to an End</title>
				<link>https://www.burr.com/consumer-finance-litigation/biden-administration-announces-mortgage-relief-as-foreclosure-moratorium-comes-to-an-end</link>
<dc:creator>Reid S. Manley, Ryli Wallace Leader</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>biden-administration-announces-mortgage-relief-as-foreclosure-moratorium-comes-to-an-end</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 09:00:08 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>In just a few days, on July 31, 2021, the national moratoriums on residential evictions and foreclosures are set to expire.&nbsp; With this deadline fast approaching, the Biden administration announced a new mortgage relief plan&nbsp;on July 23 to provide relief for individuals with federally-backed mortgages who might soon face the possibility of losing their homes.</p> <p>The new program is aimed at reducing the monthly payments for individuals with qualifying mortgage loans.&nbsp; Borrowers struggling to make their payments and facing foreclosure as the moratorium ends can negotiate a reduction in&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Eleventh Circuit Emphasizes Consumer’s Burden of Establishing Lender’s
Unreasonability to Sustain Willfulness Claim Under the FCRA</title>
				<link>https://www.burr.com/consumer-finance-litigation/eleventh-circuit-emphasizes-consumers-burden-of-establishing-lenders-unreasonability-to-sustain-willfulness-claim-under-the-fcra</link>
<dc:creator>Sara  Solano</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>eleventh-circuit-emphasizes-consumers-burden-of-establishing-lenders-unreasonability-to-sustain-willfulness-claim-under-the-fcra</guid>

					<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 09:00:09 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On July 6, 2021, the Eleventh Circuit issued a per curiam opinion affirming the Southern District of Alabama&rsquo;s entry of summary judgment in the lender&rsquo;s favor on a plaintiff&rsquo;s claim under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (&ldquo;FCRA&rdquo;), therein finding that the district court did not err in dismissing the claim for willful violation of the FCRA because the plaintiff failed to establish that the lender&rsquo;s interpretation of its obligations under the statute was objectively unreasonable.</p> <p>In <em>Ajomale v. Quicken Loans Inc.</em>, &ndash;&ndash; Fed Appx. &ndash;&ndash;, 2021 WL 2799939 (Jul. 6, 2021), the&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Supreme Court Leaves Eviction Moratorium in Place Pending Appeal in Alabama
Association of Realtors v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services</title>
				<link>https://www.burr.com/consumer-finance-litigation/supreme-court-leaves-eviction-moratorium-in-place-pending-appeal-in-alabama-association-of-realtors</link>
<dc:creator>Reid S. Manley, Ryli Wallace Leader</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>supreme-court-leaves-eviction-moratorium-in-place-pending-appeal-in-alabama-association-of-realtors</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 09:00:10 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On May 5, 2021, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued an opinion that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ("CDC") exceeded its statutory authority by issuing and extending a nationwide moratorium on evictions during the COVID-19 pandemic. <em>See Alabama Association of Realtors v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services</em>, No. 20-cv-3377 (DLF) (D.D.C. May 5, 2021). A judgment was entered vacating the moratorium, which was set to expire on June 30, 2021. However, the court entered a stay of this judgment pending the outcome of an appeal to the&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

			</channel></rss>