<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
			<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='https://www.burr.com/government-contracting/rss.xsl' ?>
			<rss version='2.0' xmlns:content='http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/'
					xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'
					xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>
				<channel>
					<title>Government Contracting | Burr &amp; Forman LLP</title>
					<link>https://www.burr.com/government-contracting/</link>
					<atom:link href='https://www.burr.com/government-contracting/?rss' rel='self' type='application/rss+xml' />
					<description><![CDATA[The latest updates to Government Contracting.]]></description>
					<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 22:12:24 -0400</lastBuildDate>
					
				<item>
				<title>How GenAI Misuse is Changing in Procurement Litigation</title>
				<link>https://www.burr.com/government-contracting/how-genai-misuse-is-changing-in-procurement-litigation</link>
<dc:creator>David P. J. Timm</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>how-genai-misuse-is-changing-in-procurement-litigation</guid>

					<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 09:00:01 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On the last day of March 2025, the Court of Federal Claims (COFC) issued the first procurement decision openly discussing &ldquo;GenAI Misuse.&rdquo;<sup><span>[1]</span></sup> I published a comprehensive 2025 <a href="https://www.burr.com/government-contracting/government-contracting/gen-ai-misuse-in-procurement-litigation">report</a> on GenAI Misuse in procurement litigation at the beginning of 2026.<sup><span>[2]</span></sup> There, I defined GenAI Misuse as the intentional or negligent use of an LLM resulting in inaccuracies that waste public and private resources.</p> <p>Over halfway through 2026, GenAI Misuse is increasing, particularly among lawyers. Research shows that this increase also does not account for a significant amount of non-public GenAI&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Another CMMC Pause: Cyber Compliance Obligations Remain—And the False
Claims Act Lurks</title>
				<link>https://www.burr.com/government-contracting/another-cmmc-pause-cyber-compliance-obligations-remain-and-the-false-claims-act-lurks</link>
<dc:creator>Kelsey M. Hayes, Michael W. Rich, David P. J. Timm</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>another-cmmc-pause-cyber-compliance-obligations-remain-and-the-false-claims-act-lurks</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 09:00:02 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Department of War (&ldquo;DOW&rdquo;) <a href="https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4542329/forging-the-arsenal-of-freedom-department-of-war-suspends-cmmc-phase-ii-require/">suspended</a> Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (&ldquo;CMMC&rdquo;) Phase 2 requirements, scheduled to take effect on November 10, 2026, for at least 60 days while a newly established &ldquo;CMMC Reform Task Force&rdquo; undertakes a comprehensive review of the program. Importantly, the suspension pauses only DOW&rsquo;s mechanism for <strong><em>verifying</em></strong> contractor compliance with existing, mandatory cybersecurity controls&mdash;it does not pause or eliminate a contractor&rsquo;s obligation to implement and maintain the controls required under FAR 52.204-21 and&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Unleashing the Defense Production Act to Boost Domestic Energy </title>
				<link>https://www.burr.com/government-contracting/unleashing-the-defense-production-act-to-boost-domestic-energy</link>
<dc:creator>Kelsey M. Hayes, Dirk D. Haire, Cheri Turnage Gatlin</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>unleashing-the-defense-production-act-to-boost-domestic-energy</guid>

					<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 09:00:03 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On April 20, 2026, the White House issued five presidential determinations invoking Title III of the Defense Production Act (&ldquo;DPA&rdquo;) across the domestic energy sector&mdash;a significant step that unlocks a powerful set of federal financing tools for energy and infrastructure contractors, as well as the companies making up their supply chains.&nbsp; Each determination declares a core energy system &ldquo;essential to national defense&rdquo; and authorizes the Department of Energy (&ldquo;DOE&rdquo;) to deploy financial incentives including direct purchases, purchase commitments, loans, and&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Should the Government Use AI Tools to Evaluate Contract Proposals? </title>
				<link>https://www.burr.com/government-contracting/should-the-government-use-ai-tools-to-evaluate-contract-proposals</link>
<dc:creator>Michael J. Brewer</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>should-the-government-use-ai-tools-to-evaluate-contract-proposals</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 09:00:04 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Contractors should prepare to have their next proposal rejected by a chatbot. &nbsp;If you&rsquo;re competing for an award under <a href="https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/aadbc0bb356746c896cbcccfd1417d7d/view">Notice ID H9240026RE001</a>, a US Special Operations Command IDIQ, the government disclosed that it &ldquo;may employ AI as a tool to assist in the analysis and review of offeror proposals,&rdquo; for tasks like &ldquo;summarizing proposal content, identifying compliance with request for task order proposal / solicitation requirements, and highlighting areas of potential strength, weakness, or risk.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p> <p>The government qualifies its intent to use AI, stating that, &ldquo;all final&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>GSA Releases Draft AI Clause Ahead of Upcoming MAS Refresh</title>
				<link>https://www.burr.com/government-contracting/gsa-releases-draft-ai-clause-ahead-of-upcoming-mas-refresh</link>
<dc:creator>Kelsey M. Hayes, Elizabeth B. Shirley, CIPP/US, CIPM, AIGP, David P. J.
Timm</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>gsa-releases-draft-ai-clause-ahead-of-upcoming-mas-refresh</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 09:00:05 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Following the government&rsquo;s very public breakup with Anthropic, GSA released<span>&nbsp;</span><a target="_blank" title="Opens in a new window" rel="noopener" href="https://buy.gsa.gov/interact/system/files/GSA_Federal_Acquisition%20Service%20Proposed%20Government%20AI%20System%20Terms%20and%20Conditions.pdf" data-externalized="true" aria-label="draft artificial intelligence (&ldquo;AI&rdquo;) terms and conditions (opens in a new window)">draft artificial intelligence (&ldquo;AI&rdquo;) terms and conditions</a><span>&nbsp;</span>that it intends to include as part of its<span>&nbsp;</span><a target="_blank" title="Opens in a new window" rel="noopener" href="https://buy.gsa.gov/interact/community/6/activity-feed/post/4d70761f-60f8-4eb0-8119-052ec4c7c9b3/Advanced_Notice_for_MAS_Refresh_31_and_Upcoming_Mass_Modification" data-externalized="true" aria-label="upcoming Multiple Award Schedule (&ldquo;MAS&rdquo;) refresh (opens in a new window)">upcoming Multiple Award Schedule (&ldquo;MAS&rdquo;) refresh</a>, currently planned for late March or April 2026.&nbsp; MAS contractors should take note: GSA&rsquo;s draft clause, GSAR 552.239-7001, Basic Safeguarding of Artificial Intelligence Systems (Feb 2026) (GSAR Deviation) represents the most comprehensive attempt to define contractor obligations when deploying AI capabilities in the performance&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Cybersecurity Noncompliance as a Deal Risk: FCA Exposure in Government
Contracts M&amp;A and Private Equity</title>
				<link>https://www.burr.com/government-contracting/cybersecurity-noncompliance-as-a-deal-risk-fca-exposure-in-government-contracts-m-a-and-private-equity</link>
<dc:creator>Kelsey M. Hayes, Sean  Milani-nia, A. Michelle  West</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>cybersecurity-noncompliance-as-a-deal-risk-fca-exposure-in-government-contracts-m-a-and-private-equity</guid>

					<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:00:06 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this year, the U.S. Department of Justice (&ldquo;DOJ&rdquo;) published its annual statistics on False Claims Act (&ldquo;FCA&rdquo;) settlements and judgments for fiscal year 2025&mdash;and reported a whopping $6.8 billion in recoveries.&nbsp; Of this amount, DOJ recovered $52 million in FCA cybersecurity actions.&nbsp; These actions were premised on allegations that the contractor failed to implement certain contractual cybersecurity controls during the performance of a government contract.&nbsp;</p> <p>In many instances, however, liability was not limited to the contractor performing the work, but&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Gen-AI Misuse in Procurement Litigation</title>
				<link>https://www.burr.com/government-contracting/gen-ai-misuse-in-procurement-litigation</link>
<dc:creator>David P. J. Timm</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>gen-ai-misuse-in-procurement-litigation</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 09:00:07 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p> <p>In 2025, federal contractors relied on large language models (&ldquo;LLM&rdquo;) for assistance in preparing a significant number of bid and size protests, monetary appeals, and related federal procurement litigation (together &ldquo;Disputes&rdquo;). We know that because at least <u>twenty</u> 2025 public Decisions showed the &ldquo;hallmarks&rdquo; of Generative Artificial Intelligence misuse (&ldquo;Gen-AI Misuse&rdquo;), defined as the intentional or negligent use of an LLM resulting in inaccuracies that waste public and private resources.<sup><a name="_ftnref1" href="#_ftn1"><span>[1]</span></a></sup></p> <p>LLMs are prone to inaccuracies, fabrications&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

			</channel></rss>