<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
			<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='https://www.burr.com/tennessee-business-litigation/rss.xsl' ?>
			<rss version='2.0' xmlns:content='http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/'
					xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'
					xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>
				<channel>
					<title>Tennessee Business Litigation Blog | Burr &amp; Forman LLP</title>
					<link>https://www.burr.com/tennessee-business-litigation/2022/</link>
					<atom:link href='https://www.burr.com/tennessee-business-litigation/2022/?rss' rel='self' type='application/rss+xml' />
					<description><![CDATA[The latest updates to Tennessee Business Litigation Blog.]]></description>
					<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 05:26:48 -0400</lastBuildDate>
					
				<item>
				<title>SCOTUS: Waiver of Arbitration Does Not Require Prejudice</title>
				<link>https://www.burr.com/tennessee-business-litigation/scotus-waiver-of-arbitration-does-not-require-prejudice</link>
<dc:creator>Thomas K. Potter, III</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>scotus-waiver-of-arbitration-does-not-require-prejudice</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 09:00:01 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>A unanimous Supreme Court held May 23 that a party&rsquo;s waiver of its arbitration right does not require showing prejudice to an opposing party, because the Federal Arbitration Act (&ldquo;FAA&rdquo;) prohibits arbitration-specific rules.</p> <p>Franchisor Sundance litigated employee Morgan&rsquo;s collective wage and hour claim for eight months before moving to compel arbitration. The courts below applied the majority rule and rejected Morgan&rsquo;s waiver argument because she showed inadequate prejudice from Sundance&rsquo;s delay.</p> <p>The Supreme Court reversed and remanded. The Court assumed&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>SCOTUS: No Look-Through Jurisdiction for Arbitration Confirmation or
Vacatur</title>
				<link>https://www.burr.com/tennessee-business-litigation/scotus-no-look-through-jurisdiction-for-arbitration-confirmation-or-vacatur</link>
<dc:creator>Thomas K. Potter, III</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>scotus-no-look-through-jurisdiction-for-arbitration-confirmation-or-vacatur</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 09:00:02 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Supreme Court held March 31, 2022, that the Federal Arbitration Act (&ldquo;FAA&rdquo;) does not allow federal courts to &ldquo;look through&rdquo; to the dispute underlying an arbitration to establish jurisdiction to confirm or vacate an arbitration award.</p> <p>The 8:1 decision by Justice Kagan distinguished the language of FAA Sections 9 (confirmation) and 10 (vacatur).</p> <p>While the FAA authorizes various petitions for relief, it does not provide a basis for jurisdiction of itself. Thus, a petitioner must establish an independent basis for federal court jurisdiction, whether&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

			</channel></rss>